Lott v. State
562 So. 2d 865, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4565, 1990 WL 86939
Opinion
Emmitt Lott appeals his sentence entered after a plea of guilty to violation of probation. He contends that the court erred by improperly departing from the sentencing guidelines plus one cell for a [866]*866sentence for violation of probation. We agree and reverse and remand for resentencing. See Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); Niehenke v. State, 561 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). .
We REVERSE and REMAND for RE-SENTENCING.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lott v. State, 562 So. 2d 865, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4565, 1990 WL 86939 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
562 So. 2d 865 (Lott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franklin v. State
545 So. 2d 851 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Niehenke v. State
561 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)