Lott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lott v. State

562 So. 2d 865, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4565, 1990 WL 86939

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 28, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1870

StatusPublished

This text of 562 So. 2d 865 (Lott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lott v. State, 562 So. 2d 865, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4565, 1990 WL 86939 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Emmitt Lott appeals his sentence entered after a plea of guilty to violation of probation. He contends that the court erred by improperly departing from the sentencing guidelines plus one cell for a [866]*866sentence for violation of probation. We agree and reverse and remand for resentencing. See Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); Niehenke v. State, 561 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). .

We REVERSE and REMAND for RE-SENTENCING.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, Judge.

Emmitt Lott appeals his sentence entered after a plea of guilty to violation of probation. He contends that the court erred by improperly departing from the sentencing guidelines plus one cell for a [866]*866sentence for violation of probation. We agree and reverse and remand for resentencing. See Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); Niehenke v. State, 561 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). .

We REVERSE and REMAND for RE-SENTENCING.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

562 So. 2d 865, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4565, 1990 WL 86939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack