Lott v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Lott v. State

160 So. 2d 636, 276 Ala. 227, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 304

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 30, 1964·No. 1 Div. 198·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

LAWSON, Justice.

The petition for certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case is hereby denied without prejudice.

The Court of Appeals will therefore give consideration to the provisions of Act 525, approved September 16, 1963, and to the holdings of the Supreme Court of the United States in Cooper v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 23, 84 S.Ct. 84, 11 L.Ed.2d 43, and in Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477, 83 S.Ct. 768, 9 L.Ed.2d 892, relative to the furnishing of transcripts to indigent appellants in coram nobis proceedings.

Writ denied without prejudice. See Birdsell v. State, 272 Ala. 700, 133 So.2d 696.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAWSON, Justice.

The petition for certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case is hereby denied without prejudice.

The Court of Appeals will therefore give consideration to the provisions of Act 525, approved September 16, 1963, and to the holdings of the Supreme Court of the United States in Cooper v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 23, 84 S.Ct. 84, 11 L.Ed.2d 43, and in Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477, 83 S.Ct. 768, 9 L.Ed.2d 892, relative to the furnishing of transcripts to indigent appellants in coram nobis proceedings.

Writ denied without prejudice. See Birdsell v. State, 272 Ala. 700, 133 So.2d 696.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Lott v. State, 160 So. 2d 636, 276 Ala. 227, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 304 (Ala. 1964).

Pincite

160 So. 2d 636 (Lott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related