Lott v. Southside Hospital

278 A.D.2d 387, 717 N.Y.S.2d 632, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13186

This text of 278 A.D.2d 387 (Lott v. Southside Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lott v. Southside Hospital, 278 A.D.2d 387, 717 N.Y.S.2d 632, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Giang Tuong Nguyen appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), entered August 31, 1999, as, upon reargument, vacated so much of a prior order of the same court, dated May 4, 1999, granting that branch of his prior motion which was to compel the plaintiff to disclose certain medical records and denying that branch of the [388]*388plaintiffs cross motion which was for a protective order, and denied that branch of his prior motion which was to compel and granted that branch of the plaintiffs prior cross motion which was for a protective order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was for a protective order as the medical records sought by the appellant are protected by the physician/patient privilege. The infant plaintiffs mother did not waive her physician/patient privilege by commencing this action on behalf of the infant plaintiff (see, Sibley v Hayes 73 Corp., 126 AD2d 629; Teresi v Grecco, 206 AD2d 517). Moreover, the physician/patient privilege of the infant plaintiffs siblings was also not waived (see, Bolos v Staten Is. Hosp., 217 AD2d 643; Dailey v LaGuardia Hosp., 130 AD2d 543).

Under the circumstances, it is unnecessary to address the appellant’s contention regarding the relevancy of the medical records.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sibley v. Hayes 73 Corp.
126 A.D.2d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Dalley v. LaGuardia Hospital
130 A.D.2d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Teresi v. Grecco
206 A.D.2d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Bolos v. Staten Island Hospital
217 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 387, 717 N.Y.S.2d 632, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-southside-hospital-nyappdiv-2000.