Lott v. Lott
63 A.2d 705, 1 N.J. 356, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 312
Opinion
We concur in the conclusion reached in the court below that the appellant failed to prove and corroborate the allegations of her petition. The decree is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.
For reversal: None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lott v. Lott, 63 A.2d 705, 1 N.J. 356, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 312 (N.J. 1949).
63 A.2d 705 (Lott v. Lott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)