Lott v. Lott
63 A.2d 705, 1 N.J. 356, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 312
This text of 63 A.2d 705 (Lott v. Lott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lott v. Lott, 63 A.2d 705, 1 N.J. 356, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 312 (N.J. 1949).
Opinion
We concur in the conclusion reached in the court below that the appellant failed to prove and corroborate the allegations of her petition. The decree is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.
For reversal: None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 A.2d 705, 1 N.J. 356, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-lott-nj-1949.