Lott v. Latimer

38 S.E. 945, 113 Ga. 635, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 337
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 25, 1901·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lewis, J.

The only question presented in this case being whether or not the plaintiff below sustained by proof his alleged cause of action, and the evidence introduced in his behalf fully warranting the finding in his favor, it does not appear that the trial judge erred in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. : Complaint. Before Judge Dart. City court of Douglas.. August 24, 1900. C. A. Ward, W. P. Ward, and Levi O’Steen, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lott v. Latimer, 38 S.E. 945, 113 Ga. 635, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 337 (Ga. 1901).

38 S.E. 945 (Lott v. Latimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanders v. State
156 S.E. 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Florida Yellow Pine Co. v. Flint River Naval Stores Co.
78 S.E. 900 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)