Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Lott v. Latimer

Lott v. Latimer

38 S.E. 945, 113 Ga. 635, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 337
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 25, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 S.E. 945 (Lott v. Latimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lott v. Latimer, 38 S.E. 945, 113 Ga. 635, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 337 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

The only question presented in this case being whether or not the plaintiff below sustained by proof his alleged cause of action, and the evidence introduced in his behalf fully warranting the finding in his favor, it does not appear that the trial judge erred in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. : Complaint. Before Judge Dart. City court of Douglas.. August 24, 1900. C. A. Ward, W. P. Ward, and Levi O’Steen, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. State
156 S.E. 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Florida Yellow Pine Co. v. Flint River Naval Stores Co.
78 S.E. 900 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.E. 945, 113 Ga. 635, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-latimer-ga-1901.