Lott v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad

42 Kan. 293
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJuly 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 42 Kan. 293 (Lott v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lott v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad, 42 Kan. 293 (kan 1889).

Opinion

Opinion by

Clogston, C.:

Two errors are presented — first, sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s third cause of action alleged in her petition; and, second, sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence at the trial. Both of these questions must be decided in favor of the defendant. First, plaintiff saved no exception to the overruling of the demurrer; therefore the ruling on the demurrer to the plaintiff’s third cause of action cannot be reviewed. Before a ruling on a demurrer can be reviewed in this court, exceptions must be saved in the court below.

As to the second error assigned, the record shows that there was no motion made by the plaintiff for a new trial. Before this court can review a demurrer to the testimony, or other errors occurring at the trial, a motion for a new trial must be made. None having been made in this case, no review can be had. (Gruble v. Ryus, 23 Kas. 195; Norris v. Evans, 39 id. 668.)

It is therefore recommended that the judgment of the court below be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchener v. City Com'rs, City of Okmulgee
1924 OK 645 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co.
1919 OK 365 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
Shawnee Mut. Fire Ins. v. School Board of School Dist. No. 31
1914 OK 447 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Insurance Co. of North America v. Little
1912 OK 369 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co.
1912 OK 159 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Wagner v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
85 P. 299 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1906)
Turner v. State ex rel. Stephenson
45 Kan. 554 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Kan. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-kansas-city-fort-scott-gulf-railroad-kan-1889.