Lott v. Graves

67 Ala. 40
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 67 Ala. 40 (Lott v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lott v. Graves, 67 Ala. 40 (Ala. 1880).

Opinion

STONE, J.

— The law casts on the surviving husband the duty and legal obligation of burying his deceased wife, and of paying for the proper funeral expenses. No one, except the wife by her own contract, can fasten a charge on ber equitable separate estate. It follows that neither the surviving husband, nor any one else, after the death of tbe owner of such estate, can incur any debt, for which the estate can be made liable.— Gunn v. Samuel, 33 Ala. 201; Smyley v. Reese, 53 Ala. 89. Tbe expense of burying Mrs. Lott -was in no sense a debt due from her estate, and could not constitute the owner of such claim a creditor of ber estate. Graves, not being a creditor of hers, had no claim or right, on that account, to the administration of ber estate, and the claim was not a debt, to justify tbe sale of her property for its payment. — Owens v. Childs, 59 Ala. 113; Garrett v. Bruner.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglas v. King
889 So. 2d 534 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2004)
Lenton v. Lawler
641 So. 2d 794 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1994)
Simpson v. Drake
150 Tenn. 80 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1923)
Phillips v. Tolerton
9 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 565 (Columbiana County Court of Common Pleas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ala. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-graves-ala-1880.