Lott v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lott v. Allstate Insurance Co.

131 S.W.3d 439, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 530, 2004 WL 769468

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 13, 2004

DocketWD 62790

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 S.W.3d 439 (Lott v. Allstate Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lott v. Allstate Insurance Co., 131 S.W.3d 439, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 530, 2004 WL 769468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allstate Insurance Company appeals from the circuit court’s judgment, after a trial before the court, for the respondents, Altha Lott and her minor children, Justin and Tracy Lott, on their petition for equitable garnishment brought pursuant to § 379.200. In bringing their equitable garnishment action, the respondents sought partial satisfaction of a judgment entered in their favor against Quinlock Shobe, in the total amount of $138,839.25, for damages they sustained in a motor vehicle accident caused by Shobe, while she was driving, with permission, a 1992 Ford Ae-rostar owned by L.C. Harris. The respondents alleged in their petition that the accident was covered by a motor vehicle insurance policy owned by Shobe and issued by the appellant in that, under the terms of the policy, the Aerostar was considered a “non-owned auto,” qualifying it as an “insured auto.”

In its sole point on appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in entering judgment for $50,000 in favor of the respondents on their equitable garnishment action, based on its finding that at the time of the accident, the Aerostar driven by Shobe was covered under her liability policy with the appellant as a “non-owned auto,” because the evidence did not support such a finding.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allstate Insurance Company appeals from the circuit court’s judgment, after a trial before the court, for the respondents, Altha Lott and her minor children, Justin and Tracy Lott, on their petition for equitable garnishment brought pursuant to § 379.200. In bringing their equitable garnishment action, the respondents sought partial satisfaction of a judgment entered in their favor against Quinlock Shobe, in the total amount of $138,839.25, for damages they sustained in a motor vehicle accident caused by Shobe, while she was driving, with permission, a 1992 Ford Ae-rostar owned by L.C. Harris. The respondents alleged in their petition that the accident was covered by a motor vehicle insurance policy owned by Shobe and issued by the appellant in that, under the terms of the policy, the Aerostar was considered a “non-owned auto,” qualifying it as an “insured auto.”

In its sole point on appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in entering judgment for $50,000 in favor of the respondents on their equitable garnishment action, based on its finding that at the time of the accident, the Aerostar driven by Shobe was covered under her liability policy with the appellant as a “non-owned auto,” because the evidence did not support such a finding.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 S.W.3d 439, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 530, 2004 WL 769468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lott-v-allstate-insurance-co-moctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack