Lotridge v. Lobasso

101 So. 3d 402, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20196, 2012 WL 5870022
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-4391
StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 3d 402 (Lotridge v. Lobasso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lotridge v. Lobasso, 101 So. 3d 402, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20196, 2012 WL 5870022 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In August, 2003, the circuit court entered an agreed final injunction for protection against repeat violence against appellant. In May, 2011, appellant moved to vacate, modify, or dissolve the injunction; he alleged changed circumstances and contended that the injunction had served its purpose. The circuit court summarily denied the motion without a hearing. We reverse and remand for a hearing on appellant’s motion, where he shall have “a meaningful opportunity to be heard.” Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colarusso v. Lupetin
28 So. 3d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 3d 402, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20196, 2012 WL 5870022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lotridge-v-lobasso-fladistctapp-2012.