Lotridge v. Lobasso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lotridge v. Lobasso

101 So. 3d 402, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20196, 2012 WL 5870022

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 2012·No. No. 4D11-4391·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In August, 2003, the circuit court entered an agreed final injunction for protection against repeat violence against appellant. In May, 2011, appellant moved to vacate, modify, or dissolve the injunction; he alleged changed circumstances and contended that the injunction had served its purpose. The circuit court summarily denied the motion without a hearing. We reverse and remand for a hearing on appellant’s motion, where he shall have “a meaningful opportunity to be heard.” Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In August, 2003, the circuit court entered an agreed final injunction for protection against repeat violence against appellant. In May, 2011, appellant moved to vacate, modify, or dissolve the injunction; he alleged changed circumstances and contended that the injunction had served its purpose. The circuit court summarily denied the motion without a hearing. We reverse and remand for a hearing on appellant’s motion, where he shall have “a meaningful opportunity to be heard.” Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ„ concur.

Lotridge v. Lobasso, 101 So. 3d 402, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20196, 2012 WL 5870022 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

101 So. 3d 402 (Lotridge v. Lobasso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related