Home/New York Court of Appeals/Lotito v. Sullivan

Lotito v. Sullivan

75 N.E.2d 744, 297 N.Y. 631, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1116
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 1947·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughrax, Oh. J., Desmond, Thaoher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.; Lewis and Coxway, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal upon the ground that it cannot be said upon the present record that “ there is in truth nothing to be tried ” (Curry v. Mackenzie 239. N. Y. 267, 270).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lotito v. Sullivan, 75 N.E.2d 744, 297 N.Y. 631, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1116 (N.Y. 1947).

75 N.E.2d 744 (Lotito v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.