Lotito v. Sullivan
75 N.E.2d 744, 297 N.Y. 631, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1116
This text of 75 N.E.2d 744 (Lotito v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lotito v. Sullivan, 75 N.E.2d 744, 297 N.Y. 631, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1116 (N.Y. 1947).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughrax, Oh. J., Desmond, Thaoher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.; Lewis and Coxway, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal upon the ground that it cannot be said upon the present record that “ there is in truth nothing to be tried ” (Curry v. Mackenzie 239. N. Y. 267, 270).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 N.E.2d 744, 297 N.Y. 631, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lotito-v-sullivan-ny-1947.