Lost Trail, Inc. v. Allied Mills, Inc.

26 F. Supp. 98, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1378
District Court, E.D. Illinois·Decided December 29, 1938·No. No. 22·Published

Opinion

WHAM, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon defendant’s motion to make the plaintiff’s complaint more definite.

As I read the Rules of Civil Procedure, the complaint conforms to their requirements. Rule 8(a), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Other methods are provided by the rules for obtaining additional particulars, if needed, in order to enable the defendant to prepare its responsive pleading or to prepare for trial. Rules 12(e), 26 to 37, and, perhaps, others. It would seem that one of the proceedings made available under the last mentioned rules should be followed here rather than for the court to require the plaintiff to attempt to disclose the information sought in the complaint itself.

Defendant’s motion will be and is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lost Trail, Inc. v. Allied Mills, Inc., 26 F. Supp. 98, 1938 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1378 (illinoised 1938).

26 F. Supp. 98 (Lost Trail, Inc. v. Allied Mills, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.