Losi v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Losi v. Allen

25 A.D.2d 474, 267 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5155

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 474 (Losi v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Losi v. Allen, 25 A.D.2d 474, 267 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5155 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this article 78 CPLR proceeding, transferred here for disposition by order of Special Term, petitioners, licensed professional engineers, seek to review and annul the order of respondent Commissioner of Education dated November 26, 1963 which sustained the determination of the State Board of Examiners of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors and accepted its recommendation that petitioners be censured and reprimanded. While there is grave doubt as to the application of subdivision 1 of section 7209 of the Education Law, we do not reach that issue in this ease. The violation of section 7210 (subd. 1, par. f) of the Education Law hae been so clearly established that the minimal discipline inflicted would have to be sustained in any event. Determination confirmed, with costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this article 78 CPLR proceeding, transferred here for disposition by order of Special Term, petitioners, licensed professional engineers, seek to review and annul the order of respondent Commissioner of Education dated November 26, 1963 which sustained the determination of the State Board of Examiners of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors and accepted its recommendation that petitioners be censured and reprimanded. While there is grave doubt as to the application of subdivision 1 of section 7209 of the Education Law, we do not reach that issue in this ease. The violation of section 7210 (subd. 1, par. f) of the Education Law hae been so clearly established that the minimal discipline inflicted would have to be sustained in any event. Determination confirmed, with costs.

Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 474, 267 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/losi-v-allen-nyappdiv-1966.