Losh v. McKinley

106 So. 3d 1014, 2013 WL 646002, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2605
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2013
DocketNo. 3D12-1290
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 So. 3d 1014 (Losh v. McKinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Losh v. McKinley, 106 So. 3d 1014, 2013 WL 646002, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2605 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

SHEPHERD, J.

As a result of our recent decision in Losh v. McKinley, 86 So.3d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), reversing an order granting [1015]*1015Carlin McKinley’s Petition to Determine Incapacity of her mother, Frances L. Losh, we now, in turn, reverse the companion order rendered April 20, 2012, granting McKinley’s “Petition for Order Authorizing Payment of Attorney’s Fee and Expenses.” See § 744.108(1), (2), Fla. Stat. (2012); In re Guardianship of Ansley, 94 So.3d 711, 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (“[A]n attorney’s entitlement to payment of reasonable fees and costs is subject to the limitation that his or her services must benefit the ward or the ward’s estate.”). McKinley’s Petition afforded no benefit to her mother.1

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schlesinger v. Jacob
240 So. 3d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 So. 3d 1014, 2013 WL 646002, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/losh-v-mckinley-fladistctapp-2013.