Losh v. McKinley

106 So. 3d 1014, 2013 WL 646002, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2605
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2013·No. No. 3D12-1290·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHEPHERD, J.

As a result of our recent decision in Losh v. McKinley, 86 So.3d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), reversing an order granting [1015]*1015Carlin McKinley’s Petition to Determine Incapacity of her mother, Frances L. Losh, we now, in turn, reverse the companion order rendered April 20, 2012, granting McKinley’s “Petition for Order Authorizing Payment of Attorney’s Fee and Expenses.” See § 744.108(1), (2), Fla. Stat. (2012); In re Guardianship of Ansley, 94 So.3d 711, 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (“[A]n attorney’s entitlement to payment of reasonable fees and costs is subject to the limitation that his or her services must benefit the ward or the ward’s estate.”). McKinley’s Petition afforded no benefit to her mother.1

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Losh v. McKinley, 106 So. 3d 1014, 2013 WL 646002, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2605 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

106 So. 3d 1014 (Losh v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schlesinger v. Jacob
240 So. 3d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)