Losh v. McKinley
This text of 106 So. 3d 1014 (Losh v. McKinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As a result of our recent decision in Losh v. McKinley, 86 So.3d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), reversing an order granting [1015]*1015Carlin McKinley’s Petition to Determine Incapacity of her mother, Frances L. Losh, we now, in turn, reverse the companion order rendered April 20, 2012, granting McKinley’s “Petition for Order Authorizing Payment of Attorney’s Fee and Expenses.” See § 744.108(1), (2), Fla. Stat. (2012); In re Guardianship of Ansley, 94 So.3d 711, 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (“[A]n attorney’s entitlement to payment of reasonable fees and costs is subject to the limitation that his or her services must benefit the ward or the ward’s estate.”). McKinley’s Petition afforded no benefit to her mother.1
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 So. 3d 1014, 2013 WL 646002, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/losh-v-mckinley-fladistctapp-2013.