Losee v. Preece

District Court, D. Utah·Decided August 31, 2021·No. 2:18-cv-00195·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

KARL LOSEE, MEMORANDUM DECISION & Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v.

SGT. PREECE et al., Case No. 2:18-CV-195-TC

Defendants. District Judge Tena Campbell

Plaintiff, Karl Losee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint, see 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 (2021). His Third Amended Complaint, (Doc. No. 35), asserts claims of cruel and unusual punishment against Defendants Preece and Despain. Defendants move for dismissal, asserting Plaintiff’s allegations are insufficient to state claims upon which relief may be granted. The Court disagrees and therefore denies Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Defendants must therefore move beyond their motion to dismiss to the next stage of litigation. The Court now orders Defendants to file a Martinez report1 and dispositive motion as follows:

1 See Martinez v. Aaron, 570 F.2d 317 (10th Cir. 1978) (approving district court’s practice of ordering prison administration to prepare report to be included in pleadings in cases when prisoner has filed suit alleging constitutional violation against institution officials). In Gee v. Estes, 829 F.2d 1005 (10th Cir. 1987), the Tenth Circuit explained the nature and function of a Martinez report, saying: Under the Martinez procedure, the district judge or a United States magistrate [judge] to whom the matter has been referred will direct prison officials to respond in writing to the various allegations, supporting their response by affidavits and copies of internal disciplinary rules and reports. The purpose of the Martinez report is to ascertain whether there is a factual as well as a legal basis for the prisoner's claims. This, of course, will allow the court to dig beneath the conclusional allegations. These reports have proved useful to (A) If Defendants wish to assert the affirmative defense of Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in a grievance process, Defendants must, (i) within 90 days, prepare and file a Martinez report limited to the exhaustion issue; and, (ii) within 120 days, file a separate summary judgment motion, with a supporting memorandum. (B) If Defendants choose not to rely on the defense of failure to exhaust and wishes to pierce the allegations of the Complaint, Defendants must, (i) within 90 days, prepare and file a Martinez report addressing the substance of the complaint; and,

(ii) within 120 days, file a separate summary judgment motion, with a supporting memorandum. (C) If Defendants wish to seek relief otherwise contemplated under the procedural rules (e.g., requesting an evidentiary hearing), Defendants must file an appropriate motion within 90 days of filing their answer. Plaintiff is notified that Plaintiff may, within 30 days of its filing, respond to a Martinez report if desired. Plaintiff is further notified that Plaintiff must, within 30 days of its filing, respond to the summary-judgment motion. Plaintiff is finally notified that, when Defendants move for summary judgment, Plaintiff may not rest upon the mere allegations in the complaint. Instead, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e), to survive a motion for summary

determine whether the case is so devoid of merit as to warrant dismissal without trial. Id. at 1007. judgment Plaintiff must allege specific facts, admissible in evidence, showing that there is a genuine issue remaining for trial. ORDER Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (Doc. No. 40.) (2) Defendants must within 20 days file an answer and within 90 days file a Martinez report. (3) When served with a Martinez report, Plaintiff may submit a response within 30 days of the report’s filing date. (4) Defendants must within 120 days file a summary-judgment motion. (5) When served with a summary-judgment motion, Plaintiff must submit a response within 30 days of the motion’s filing date. For Plaintiff's information and convenience, the Court has attached the procedural rules governing summary-judgment practice. (6) NO TIME EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. DATED this 31st day of August, 2021. BY THE COURT:

United States District Court

Fed Rule of Civil Procedure 56

Rule 56. Summary Judgment  (a) Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment. A party may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense - or the part of each claim or defense—on which summary judgment is sought. The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court should state on the record the reasons for granting or denying the motion.  (b) Time to File a Motion. Unless a different time is set by local rule or the court orders otherwise, a party may file a motion for summary judgment at any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery.  (c) Procedures. o (1) Supporting Factual Positions. A party asserting that a fact cannot be or is genuinely disputed must support the assertion by:  (A) citing to particular parts of materials in the record, including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations (including those made for purposes of the motion only), admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials; or  (B) showing that the materials cited do not establish the absence or presence of a genuine dispute, or that an adverse party cannot produce admissible evidence to support the fact. o (2) Objection That a Fact Is Not Supported by Admissible Evidence. A party may object that the material cited to support or dispute a fact cannot be presented in a form that would be admissible in evidence. o (3) Materials Not Cited. The court need consider only the cited materials, but it may consider other materials in the record. o (4) Affidavits or Declarations. An affidavit or declaration used to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant or declarant is competent to testify on the matters stated.  (d) When Facts Are Unavailable to the Nonmovant. If a nonmovant shows by affidavit or declaration that, for specified reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition, the court may: o (1) defer considering the motion or deny it; o (2) allow time to obtain affidavits or declarations or to take discovery; or o (3) issue any other appropriate order.  (e) Failing to Properly Support or Address a Fact. If a party fails to properly support an assertion of fact or fails to properly address another party’s assertion of fact as required by Rule 56(c), the court may: o (1) give an opportunity to properly support or address the fact; o (2) consider the fact undisputed for purposes of the motion; o (3) grant summary judgment if the motion and supporting materials—including the facts considered undisputed—show that the movant is entitled to it; or o (4) issue any other appropriate order.  (f) Judgment Independent of the Motion. After giving notice and a reasonable time to respond, the court may: o (1) grant summary judgment for a nonmovant; o (2) grant the motion on grounds not raised by a party; or o (3) consider summary judgment on its own after identifying for the parties material facts that may not be genuinely in dispute.  (g) Failing to Grant All the Requested Relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Losee v. Preece, (D. Utah 2021).

Losee v. Preece (Losee v. Preece) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martinez v. Aaron
570 F.2d 317 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
Gee v. Estes
829 F.2d 1005 (Tenth Circuit, 1987)