Losee v. McCarty

5 Utah 528
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1888
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Utah 528 (Losee v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Losee v. McCarty, 5 Utah 528 (Utah 1888).

Opinion

Zane, C. J.:

The respondent, H. Losee, commenced this action on the 14th day of September, 1887, in the first district court of Ogden, Utah, against the defendants, Ream and McCarty, and afterwards obtained a judgment against the former for the sum of $497. At the time of commencing this action, the plaintiff also sued out a writ of attachment therein against Ream, that was served upon'the Union Pacific Railway Company as garnishee. The company answered that it was indebted to Ream in the sum of $204, but that the indebtedness was contracted in Idaho territory, and that it was not subject to garnishment, therefore, in Utah. It appears from' the record that the Union Pacific Railway Company is a corporation under the laws of the United States, and is' operating its road and doing-business in this territory, where the service of the writ was made on it.' It must therefore by • this court be regarded as a domestic corporation' of Utah: 2 Morawetz Private Corp., sec. 984. Being a domestic corporation of this territory, the writ of attachment issued out of the first district court was rightfully served on it in that district, and the debt was properly garnisheed. The order appealed from is affirmed.

Henderson, J., concurred. Boreman, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Utah 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/losee-v-mccarty-utah-1888.