Losch's Appeal

109 Pa. 72, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 483
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 2, 1885
DocketNo. 104
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 109 Pa. 72 (Losch's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Losch's Appeal, 109 Pa. 72, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 483 (Pa. 1885).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was filed

Per Curiam.

The owner of land is the person in whose name proceedings are to be instituted to recover damages or compensation for laud taken or injured by a railroad or canal company. The same rule applies in the case of public roads and streets : McFadden v. Johnson, 22 P. F. S., 335 ; Tenbrooke v. Jahke, 27 Id., 392. Damages being in the nature of a trespass for injury done to the land do not pass by a subsequent conveyance thereof. The damages were a personal claim of the owner when the injury occurred. They do not run with the land nor pass by the deed, although not specifically reserved.

Prior to the purchase by the appellant in this case the damages had not only been sustained, but had actually been assessed. The fact that a right of appeal existed, and the appellant purchased before the right of the vendor to appeal had expired, did not pass it to the appellant. It remained in the vendor as if he had not conveyed the land.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hutchison v. Ash
74 Pa. D. & C. 481 (Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas, 1949)
Carlisle Borough v. Fladger
42 A.2d 187 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Holmes' Appeal
22 Pa. D. & C. 543 (Centre County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Briegel v. Briegel
160 A. 531 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
In re Widening of Walnut Street
12 Pa. D. & C. 610 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1929)
Kaufmann v. Pittsburgh
93 A. 779 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Coons v. McKees Rocks Borough
90 A. 141 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Quade v. Columbia & Port Deposit Railway Co.
81 A. 813 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Sloan v. Hoyt
40 Pa. Super. 181 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
James v. West Chester Borough
69 A. 1042 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Pulaski Avenue
33 Pa. Super. 108 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 Pa. 72, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loschs-appeal-pa-1885.