Lorzing v. Eisenberg

City of New York Municipal Court

Lorzing v. Eisenberg

5 Misc. 590

DecidedJuly 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Misc. 590 (Lorzing v. Eisenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lorzing v. Eisenberg, 5 Misc. 590 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

Having determined in the action of Lorzing v. Eisenberg, ante, page 358, on the appeal from the order denying the motion to open the default to reverse said [591]*591order, as matter of course this judgment falls. But this is without fault of the respondent.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and a new trial ordered; no costs.

Fitzsimons, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy, J.

Having determined in the action of Lorzing v. Eisenberg, ante, page 358, on the appeal from the order denying the motion to open the default to reverse said [591]*591order, as matter of course this judgment falls. But this is without fault of the respondent.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and a new trial ordered; no costs.

Fitzsimons, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Misc. 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorzing-v-eisenberg-nynyccityct-1893.