Lorton v. Woodward

5 Del. Ch. 505
CourtCourt of Chancery of Delaware
DecidedSeptember 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 5 Del. Ch. 505 (Lorton v. Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorton v. Woodward, 5 Del. Ch. 505 (Del. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The bequest of the income arising from the fund, to Cornelia Lorton and her heirs forever, was the bequest of the corpus of the fund itself to her, which, not being paid to her in her'lifetime, the complainant, as her personal representative, is entitled to receive.

The devise of the income and profits of real estate to one and his heirs is held to be a devise of the land itself; and there can be no reason why the income arising from, personal estate devised to Cornelia Lorton and her heirs forever, at the death of Elizabeth C. Cornish, should not be held an absolute devise of the fund itself.

Let a decree be drawn accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harman v. Eastburn
76 A.2d 315 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1950)
Wilmington Trust Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co.
15 A.2d 830 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1940)
Maloney v. Johnson
5 A.2d 660 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1939)
National Bank of Smyrna v. Ireland
162 A. 54 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1932)
Wilmington Trust Co. v. Houlehan
131 A. 529 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1925)
Houston v. Houston
175 A. 51 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Del. Ch. 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorton-v-woodward-delch-1883.