Lortie v. Fortin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lortie v. Fortin

421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28148

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 3, 1982

DocketNo. 82-720

StatusPublished

This text of 421 So. 2d 193 (Lortie v. Fortin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lortie v. Fortin, 421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28148 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from here resulted after a directed verdict based upon the trial court’s determination that appellants appropriate remedy was by way of a stockholder’s derivative action rather than through an action brought by appellants in their capacities as trustees of a dissolved corporation. We agree. See, e.g., Carothers v. Patton, 288 So.2d 293 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). . We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from here resulted after a directed verdict based upon the trial court’s determination that appellants appropriate remedy was by way of a stockholder’s derivative action rather than through an action brought by appellants in their capacities as trustees of a dissolved corporation. We agree. See, e.g., Carothers v. Patton, 288 So.2d 293 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). . We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lortie-v-fortin-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack