Lortie v. Fortin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lortie v. Fortin

421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28148

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1982·No. No. 82-720·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from here resulted after a directed verdict based upon the trial court’s determination that appellants appropriate remedy was by way of a stockholder’s derivative action rather than through an action brought by appellants in their capacities as trustees of a dissolved corporation. We agree. See, e.g., Carothers v. Patton, 288 So.2d 293 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). . We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from here resulted after a directed verdict based upon the trial court’s determination that appellants appropriate remedy was by way of a stockholder’s derivative action rather than through an action brought by appellants in their capacities as trustees of a dissolved corporation. We agree. See, e.g., Carothers v. Patton, 288 So.2d 293 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). . We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Lortie v. Fortin, 421 So. 2d 193, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28148 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

421 So. 2d 193 (Lortie v. Fortin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related