Lorna McDonald v. Andrew Cha Dentistry, P.C.
Opinion
l)ISMISS: Opinion tiled oveiiiber 15, 2012
In The uf Aiitat (nurt FiftI! Jiitrirt if Lixa at Ja11ai No. 05-12-01 184-CV
LORNA NICDONALI), Appellant
V.
ANDREW CHA DENTISTRY, P.C., Appellee
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-i 1-16043
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Myers Opinion By Justice Moseley
Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties inform the
Court that they have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion and dismiss
the appeal. See TEx. R. Apr. P. 42.l(a)(I).
JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
121 [84F.P05 0 (fnitrt tif 1pI:a15 fift1! Dhtrirt nf rxas at Da11a JUDGMENT LORNA MCDONALD, Appellant Appeal from the 10 1st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct. No. DC-Il -
No. 05-12-01 184-CV V. 16043). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley. A N I) RE W C F! A I) EN TI ST R Y, P.C., Justices Fillmore and Myers, participating. Appel lee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellec, Andrew Cha Dentistry, P.C., recover its costs of the appeal from appellant, Lorna McDonald.
Judgment entered Noember 15 2012 /
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lorna McDonald v. Andrew Cha Dentistry, P.C. (Lorna McDonald v. Andrew Cha Dentistry, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.