Lorince v. Universal Underwriters

828 N.E.2d 115, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1559
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 25, 2005
Docket2005-0103
StatusPublished

This text of 828 N.E.2d 115 (Lorince v. Universal Underwriters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorince v. Universal Underwriters, 828 N.E.2d 115, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1559 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 83711, 2004-Ohio-6287. Discretionary appeal accepted.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Discretionary cross-appeal accepted.

O’Donnell, J., would accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Resnick, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
828 N.E.2d 115, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorince-v-universal-underwriters-ohio-2005.