Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Lorillard v. Clyde

Lorillard v. Clyde

12 Jones & S. 556
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedApril 1, 1878
StatusPublished

This text of 12 Jones & S. 556 (Lorillard v. Clyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorillard v. Clyde, 12 Jones & S. 556 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Opinion

By the Court.—Curtis, Ch. J.

I think the demurrer should be sustained, for the reasons assigned in his opinion by the learned judge at special term, and that the order appealed from should be affirmed, with like leave to the plaintiff to amend his complaint.

Sanford, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Jones & S. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorillard-v-clyde-nysuperctnyc-1878.