Lorie v. Calderon

772 So. 2d 537, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 399, 1996 WL 23511
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 1996·No. No. 95-2397·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a nonfinal appeal questioning the propriety of a temporary injunction, as modified, urging error as to its issuance and the amount of the bond required. On this record we affirm the issuance of the temporary injunction, as modified, without prejudice to the defendants in the trial court seeking an “appropriate bond” if they deem the amount insufficient. Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.610(d); World Security Fund v. Schmidt, 406 So.2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

This opinion is not to be construed as making any ruling on the propriety of the underlying action as to the application of the “economic loss rule” to the alleged RICO cause of action.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lorie v. Calderon, 772 So. 2d 537, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 399, 1996 WL 23511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

772 So. 2d 537 (Lorie v. Calderon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lorie v. CLN
757 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)