Lori Myers v. Starbucks Corporation
This text of Lori Myers v. Starbucks Corporation (Lori Myers v. Starbucks Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 24 2024 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LORI MYERS, an individual, on behalf of No. 22-55930 herself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:20-cv-00335-JWH-SHK
v. MEMORANDUM* STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation,
Defendant,
and
MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY US, LLC, A Delaware Corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 12, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiff-Appellant Lori Myers sued Defendant-Appellee Mars Wrigley
Confectionary US, LLC (“Mars”) under the California Consumers Legal Remedies
Act and California’s Unfair Competition Law. Myers claimed the label of Mars’s
Dove Dark Chocolate products misled her to believe the products were made
without employing child slave labor or contributing to rainforest deforestation.
According to Myers’s complaint, “Child slavery is undisputably endemic in cocoa
harvesting in West Africa,” and “it is also well-settled that the ‘Chocolate industry
drives rainforest disaster in [the] Ivory Coast.’” (Citation omitted.) “[A]t the
current pace of deforestation there will be no forest left in the Ivory Coast by
2030.”
Myers alleges that Mars places the following label on its Dove Dark
Chocolate products but not on its other chocolate products: “We buy cocoa from
Rainforest Alliance Certified™ farms, traceable from the farms into our factory.”
Myers claims this label led her to believe the company’s Dove Dark Chocolate
products contain some amount of cocoa traceable to farms that do not employ child
slave labor or contribute to deforestation in West Africa. According to Myers’s
complaint, however, Mars in fact can trace only a fraction of the cocoa it buys to
the farms where the cocoa beans originated, and it intermingles these traceable
2 beans with untraceable beans in its factories “so that no product can be guaranteed
to contain any fair trade beans at all.”
The district court dismissed Myers’s claims against Mars. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and may affirm on any ground supported
by the record. Silk v. Bond, 65 F.4th 445, 456 (9th Cir. 2023). We affirm.
The district court incorrectly dismissed Myers’s complaint on the ground
that the label on Mars’s Dove Dark Chocolate products is “carefully worded” and
“technically true.” Under California law, literal truth is not a defense. As our
circuit and the California courts have recognized, “California laws ‘prohibit “not
only advertising which is false, but also advertising which[,] although true, is
either actually misleading or which has a capacity, likelihood or tendency to
deceive or confuse the public.”’” Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., 966 F.3d 1007,
1017 (9th Cir. 2020) (emphasis and alteration in original) (quoting Williams v.
Gerber Prods. Co., 552 F.3d 934, 938 (9th Cir. 2008)); see also Kasky v. Nike,
Inc., 45 P.3d 243, 250 (Cal. 2002) (same).
We nonetheless affirm the dismissal of Myers’s claims. Chocolate
consumers might reasonably assume from the language of the label and its
exclusive placement on Dove Dark Chocolate products that some amount of beans
from Rainforest Alliance Certified farms were used in the production of Dove Dark
3 Chocolate. However, Mars’s Dove Dark Chocolate label does not represent that
Rainforest Alliance Certified farms avoid deforestation and the use of child labor.
Nor does Myers allege that Rainforest Alliance Certified farms do so. “[A]
significant portion” of reasonable chocolate consumers thus would not be led to
believe that Dove Dark Chocolate contained cocoa beans produced without child
labor and deforestation. Ebner v. Fresh, Inc., 838 F.3d 958, 965 (9th Cir. 2016)
(quoting Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co., 129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 486, 495 (Cal. Ct. App.
2003)).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lori Myers v. Starbucks Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lori-myers-v-starbucks-corporation-ca9-2024.