Lori Matheson v. Michael Schmitt
This text of Lori Matheson v. Michael Schmitt (Lori Matheson v. Michael Schmitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 6, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160931 & (86)(91) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra LORI MATHESON, a/k/a LORI Richard H. Bernstein ANN SCHMITT, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellant, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 160931 COA: 347022 Oakland CC: 2015-831539-DM MICHAEL SCHMITT, Defendant-Appellee.
_____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The emergency motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The request for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The request to stay trial court proceedings is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 6, 2020 b0303 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lori Matheson v. Michael Schmitt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lori-matheson-v-michael-schmitt-mich-2020.