Lori Ann Cano v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 25, 2022
Docket13-22-00373-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lori Ann Cano v. the State of Texas (Lori Ann Cano v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lori Ann Cano v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00373-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

LORI ANN CANO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court of Burnet County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

On June 30, 2022, appellant attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction of

forgery of a government or financial instrument entered in trial court cause number

CR13000716-A. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed with a judgment of conviction on April 14,

2022. On August 11, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that it appeared the appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was advised the appeal would be dismissed

if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice.

This Court’s appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.

1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ

of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the

availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App.

1999).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 25th day of August, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Ex Parte Garcia
988 S.W.2d 240 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lori Ann Cano v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lori-ann-cano-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.