Loretter Brock v. Ruth Stimley

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 28, 2012·No. 01-11-00569-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 28, 2012.

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

NO. 01-11-00569-CV ____________

LORETTER BROCK, Appellant

V.

RUTH STIMLEY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-64366

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order signed on June 30,

2011.

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v.

Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if authorized by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53

S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001).

On November 15, 2011, the Court notified the parties of its intent to dismiss

the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating

this court’s jurisdiction on or before November 29, 2011. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a). Appellant has not filed a response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loretter Brock v. Ruth Stimley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Loretter Brock v. Ruth Stimley (Loretter Brock v. Ruth Stimley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson
53 S.W.3d 352 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)