Loretter Brock v. Ruth Stimley
Opinion
Opinion issued June 28, 2012.
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
NO. 01-11-00569-CV ____________
LORETTER BROCK, Appellant
V.
RUTH STIMLEY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-64366
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order signed on June 30,
2011.
Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v.
Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if authorized by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53
S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001).
On November 15, 2011, the Court notified the parties of its intent to dismiss
the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating
this court’s jurisdiction on or before November 29, 2011. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(a). Appellant has not filed a response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loretter Brock v. Ruth Stimley (Loretter Brock v. Ruth Stimley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.