Lorenzo v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lorenzo v. Travis

11 A.D.3d 833, 783 N.Y.S.2d 318, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12720

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 A.D.3d 833 (Lorenzo v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lorenzo v. Travis, 11 A.D.3d 833, 783 N.Y.S.2d 318, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Sheridan, J.), entered June 24, 2003 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

[834]*834Since the determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and again was denied parole release. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in January 2004, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Rivera v Travis, 8 AD3d 716 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Sheridan, J.), entered June 24, 2003 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

[834]*834Since the determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and again was denied parole release. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in January 2004, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Rivera v Travis, 8 AD3d 716 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.3d 833, 783 N.Y.S.2d 318, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenzo-v-travis-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack