Lorenzo v. Agency for Health Care Administration
This text of 985 So. 2d 703 (Lorenzo v. Agency for Health Care Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Miguel LORENZO, Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Paolo Annino, and Michael Brownlee, Certified Legal Intern, of FSU College of Law, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Justin Senior, and Amanda Reynolds, Certified Legal Intern, of Agency for Health Care Administration, Tallahassee, for appellee.
SHAHOOD, C.J.
This is an appeal by Miguel Lorenzo from a Final Order of the Department of Children and Families. The order appealed affirmed the Agency for Health Care Administration's denial of reimbursement for the costs of hyperbaric oxygen treatments for his son, who has hypoxic brain injury from almost drowning.
At issue is whether the treatment in question is experimental or investigational, or medically necessary.
The State of Florida through the Agency for Health Care Administration determines whether such treatment is medically necessary, or experimental. The Agency determined that there is no evidence that hyperbaric oxygen treatment is an effective medically necessary treatment for this patient's condition. We agree and accordingly affirm the Final Order.
Affirmed.
KLEIN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
985 So. 2d 703, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10305, 2008 WL 2663768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenzo-v-agency-for-health-care-administration-fladistctapp-2008.