Lorenzo Richard Farnell v. Solicitor-General of the United States United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida

429 F.2d 1318, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8088
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 20, 1970·No. 29324·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is a federal convict serving a two-year sentence for violating Title 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a). 1 He is not attacking that conviction, but he filed a petition in the court below seeking to have certain evidence produced for his inspection and other evidence suppressed. As the district court stated, motions for discovery and inspection and for suppression of evidence are available prior to trial but not at this late date. Rule 16, F.R.Crim.P.; United States v. Kessler. 2 The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to our Rule 18 this case is decided without oral argument.

2

. 253 F.2a 290 (2d Cir. 1958).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lorenzo Richard Farnell v. Solicitor-General of the United States United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, 429 F.2d 1318, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8088 (5th Cir. 1970).

429 F.2d 1318 (Lorenzo Richard Farnell v. Solicitor-General of the United States United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Gibson
513 F.2d 978 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)
DeLuna v. State
501 P.2d 1021 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1972)
A. Kenneth Hawkes v. Internal Revenue Service
467 F.2d 787 (Sixth Circuit, 1972)