Lorenzo Meraz Davila v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 29, 2019·No. 11-19-00071-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

No. 11-19-00071-CV

LORENZO MERAZ DAVILA, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 385th District Court Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR44032

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Lorenzo Meraz Davila has filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order to withdraw funds from his inmate trust account. Upon reviewing the documents filed in this court, we wrote Appellant and informed him that it did not appear that this court had jurisdiction to entertain his appeal. We requested that Appellant respond and show grounds to continue this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant has filed a response, but his response fails to show grounds upon which this appeal may continue.

Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840–41 (Tex. 2007); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A notice or order to withdraw funds is not a final, appealable order. See Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315, 316 n.1, 321 (Tex. 2009) (“withdrawal order” is actually a notification from the court, not an order); Ramirez v. State, 318 S.W.3d 906, 907–08 (Tex. App.—Waco 2010, no pet.). The documents on file in this court, including Appellant’s response and his notice of appeal, indicate that Appellant is attempting to appeal from the trial court’s order to withdraw funds. It does not appear that Appellant has filed any post-notification motion in the trial court, such as a motion to strike the order to withdraw inmate funds. An order ruling on such a motion would be appealable. See Harrell, 286 S.W.3d 315. However, at this time, no appealable order has been entered in this case.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

March 29, 2019 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lorenzo Meraz Davila v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Lorenzo Meraz Davila v. State (Lorenzo Meraz Davila v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texas a & M University System v. Koseoglu
233 S.W.3d 835 (Texas Supreme Court, 2007)
Harrell v. State
286 S.W.3d 315 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Ramirez v. State
318 S.W.3d 906 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)