Lorenzo Emilio Rodriguez v. State
This text of Lorenzo Emilio Rodriguez v. State (Lorenzo Emilio Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-00396-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE COASTAL KING, LTD.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, Coastal King, Ltd., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in entering an order outside of its plenary
jurisdiction. This Court requested and received a response from Benigno Cerda, Jr, and
Francisco Cerda, the real parties in interest, who “do not object to the granting of Relator’s
petition.”
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has shown itself entitled to the relief sought. Without hearing oral argument, we conditionally grant mandamus relief and direct
the trial court to vacate its May 20, 2008 order granting Coastal King’s Motion for Summary
and Entering Death Penalty Sanctions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(c). We are confident the
trial court will promptly comply; our writ will issue only if it does not.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 8th day of July, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lorenzo Emilio Rodriguez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenzo-emilio-rodriguez-v-state-texapp-2008.