Lorenzo Charles Garrett v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 18, 2006
Docket13-06-00120-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Lorenzo Charles Garrett v. State (Lorenzo Charles Garrett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorenzo Charles Garrett v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

               NUMBERS 13-06-120-CR and 13-06-121-CR

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

LORENZO CHARLES GARRETT,                                  Appellant,

                                           v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                              Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

                      On appeal from the County Court

                          of Gonzales County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, LORENZO CHARLES GARRETT, attempted to perfect  appeals from judgments entered by the County Court of Gonzales County, Texas.  Sentence was imposed on February 2, 2006.  The notices of appeal were due to be filed on March 6, 2006, but were not filed until March 10, 2006.   Said notices of appeal are untimely filed.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within  fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension.  Appellant failed to file his notices of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeals, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 18th day of May, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lorenzo Charles Garrett v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenzo-charles-garrett-v-state-texapp-2006.