Lorenzo Adkins v. Wardens, Indian Creek Correctional Center

74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39006, 1996 WL 26691
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 1996·No. 95-7421·Published

Opinion

74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lorenzo ADKINS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
WARDENS, Indian Creek Correctional Center, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-7421.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Lorenzo Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lorenzo Adkins v. Wardens, Indian Creek Correctional Center, 74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39006, 1996 WL 26691 (4th Cir. 1996).

74 F.3d 1230 (Lorenzo Adkins v. Wardens, Indian Creek Correctional Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Croom
650 F.2d 521 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)