Lorenzen v. Cavanaugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lorenzen v. Cavanaugh

222 A.D. 679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 A.D. 679 (Lorenzen v. Cavanaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lorenzen v. Cavanaugh, 222 A.D. 679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for lack of prosecution reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. There is absolutely nothing in the record to excuse plaintiff’s delay in bringing the action to trial, and this court has held in similar circumstances that the motion to dismiss should be granted. (Cohen v. Meyer, 218 App. Div. 847; McGee v. Levy, 215 id. 720; McIntyre v. Branner, 214 id. 145.) Young, Rich, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for lack of prosecution reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. There is absolutely nothing in the record to excuse plaintiff’s delay in bringing the action to trial, and this court has held in similar circumstances that the motion to dismiss should be granted. (Cohen v. Meyer, 218 App. Div. 847; McGee v. Levy, 215 id. 720; McIntyre v. Branner, 214 id. 145.) Young, Rich, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenzen-v-cavanaugh-nyappdiv-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack