Lorenz v. Lorenz

Supreme Court of Florida

Lorenz v. Lorenz

13 So. 2d 805, 152 Fla. 778, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 696

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 11, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully examined the so-called “Supplemental Transcript of Record of Proceedings in the Circuit Court” in the above entitled cause and we cannot determine whether it contains all pleadings filed and facts established since the mandate was issued by this Court in this litigation. The challenged order is necesarily based on such facts and pleadings and in view of the incompleteness of the record we cannot say that error on the part of the chancellor has been clearly made to appear. Because of this state of the record the petition for certiorari is denied.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully examined the so-called “Supplemental Transcript of Record of Proceedings in the Circuit Court” in the above entitled cause and we cannot determine whether it contains all pleadings filed and facts established since the mandate was issued by this Court in this litigation. The challenged order is necesarily based on such facts and pleadings and in view of the incompleteness of the record we cannot say that error on the part of the chancellor has been clearly made to appear. Because of this state of the record the petition for certiorari is denied.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Lorenz v. Lorenz, 13 So. 2d 805, 152 Fla. 778, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 696 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

13 So. 2d 805 (Lorenz v. Lorenz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.