Lorenz v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America

197 Misc. 21, 94 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3034
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 17, 1949
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 197 Misc. 21 (Lorenz v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorenz v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, 197 Misc. 21, 94 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It plainly appears that at the time of the robbery ” plaintiffs’ messenger or agent was not actually cognizant of the commission of the alleged felonious act as testified; indeed he was not aware of such act. The loss was not by reason of the “ robbery ” as defined in the policy.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Pecoba, Edeb and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

VAM Check Cashing v. Federal Insurance Company
699 F.3d 727 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Vam Check Cashing Corp. v. Federal Insurance
787 F. Supp. 2d 264 (E.D. New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 Misc. 21, 94 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenz-v-indemnity-insurance-co-of-north-america-nyappterm-1949.