Lorenz v. Harrington
This text of 332 F. App'x 159 (Lorenz v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Eduard Lorenz appeals a district court order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus in which he sought an order from the court directing that the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Virginia allow him to proceed in forma pauperis. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lorenz v. Harrington, No. 1:09-cv-00456-JCD-IDD (E.D.Va. May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [160]*160in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenz-v-harrington-ca4-2009.