Lorenz v. Harrington

Fourth Circuit

Lorenz v. Harrington

332 F. App'x 159

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2009·No. No. 09-6920·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eduard Lorenz appeals a district court order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus in which he sought an order from the court directing that the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Virginia allow him to proceed in forma pauperis. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lorenz v. Harrington, No. 1:09-cv-00456-JCD-IDD (E.D.Va. May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [160] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eduard Lorenz appeals a district court order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus in which he sought an order from the court directing that the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Virginia allow him to proceed in forma pauperis. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lorenz v. Harrington, No. 1:09-cv-00456-JCD-IDD (E.D.Va. May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [160] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lorenz v. Harrington, 332 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 159 (Lorenz v. Harrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.