Lorenz-Schneider Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lorenz-Schneider Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

17 A.D.2d 842, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7557

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 842 (Lorenz-Schneider Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lorenz-Schneider Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 17 A.D.2d 842, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent pursuant to section 66 of the Civil Practice Act, for the issuance of an order directing substituted service; an application for such order having been previously made to a Justice of the Supreme Court and refused. Motion denied, without prejudice to a renewed application to a Justice of the Supreme Court upon additional affidavit showing that recent attempts to serve the two officers of the petitioner corporation have proved unavailing, and without prejudice to a further application to this court under said section 66 in the event the said Justice should refuse to grant the order requested upon such renewed application. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent pursuant to section 66 of the Civil Practice Act, for the issuance of an order directing substituted service; an application for such order having been previously made to a Justice of the Supreme Court and refused. Motion denied, without prejudice to a renewed application to a Justice of the Supreme Court upon additional affidavit showing that recent attempts to serve the two officers of the petitioner corporation have proved unavailing, and without prejudice to a further application to this court under said section 66 in the event the said Justice should refuse to grant the order requested upon such renewed application. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 842, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenz-schneider-co-v-international-brotherhood-of-teamsters-nyappdiv-1962.