Lorenz & Associates, Inc. v. Carlson Construction Co.

775 S.W.2d 349, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1224
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 1989·No. No. 55446·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in an action for breach of contract and to enforce a mechanic’s lien. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lorenz & Associates, Inc. v. Carlson Construction Co., 775 S.W.2d 349, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1224 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

775 S.W.2d 349 (Lorenz & Associates, Inc. v. Carlson Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)