Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, Inc.

145 F.2d 470, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2551
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 1944·No. No. 5312·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Judge, 47 F.Supp. 969.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, Inc., 145 F.2d 470, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2551 (4th Cir. 1944).

145 F.2d 470 (Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Croft & Scully Co. v. M/v Skulptor Vuchetich, Etc.
664 F.2d 1277 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Mitsui & Co. v. American Export Lines, Inc.
636 F.2d 807 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Eaton Corp., Etc. v. Ss Galeona
474 F. Supp. 819 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Commonwealth Petrochemicals, Inc. v. S/S Puerto Rico
455 F. Supp. 310 (D. Maryland, 1978)
Dow Chemical Co. v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.
330 F. Supp. 1304 (S.D. Texas, 1971)
Horn v. Cia de Navegacion Fruco
404 F.2d 422 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Reliance Insurance Company v. Brickenkamp
147 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Ferrante v. Detroit Fire and Marine Insurance Co.
125 F. Supp. 621 (S.D. California, 1954)
Middle East Agency v. the John B. Waterman
86 F. Supp. 487 (S.D. New York, 1949)