Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica
This text of 145 F.2d 470 (Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Oivind LORENTZEN, Director and Curator of Shipping of the Royal Norwegian Government, Claimant of the BILL, Appellant,
v.
BRAZIL OITICICA, Inc., Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Carver W. Wolfe, of New York City (Hatch & Wolfe, of New York City, and Ritchie, Janney, Ober & Williams and Robert W. Williams, all of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.
Henry N. Longley, of New York City (Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City, and Lord & Whip and George W. P. Whip, all of Baltimore, Md., and F. Herbert Prem, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Before SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Judge, 47 F.Supp. 969.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
145 F.2d 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorentzen-v-brazil-oiticica-ca4-1944.