Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica

145 F.2d 470
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 1944
Docket5312
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 F.2d 470 (Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorentzen v. Brazil Oiticica, 145 F.2d 470 (4th Cir. 1944).

Opinion

145 F.2d 470 (1944)

Oivind LORENTZEN, Director and Curator of Shipping of the Royal Norwegian Government, Claimant of the BILL, Appellant,
v.
BRAZIL OITICICA, Inc., Appellee.

No. 5312.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

November 20, 1944.

Carver W. Wolfe, of New York City (Hatch & Wolfe, of New York City, and Ritchie, Janney, Ober & Williams and Robert W. Williams, all of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.

Henry N. Longley, of New York City (Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City, and Lord & Whip and George W. P. Whip, all of Baltimore, Md., and F. Herbert Prem, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Judge, 47 F.Supp. 969.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NATIONAL SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. Motorship Las Villas
225 F. Supp. 686 (E.D. Louisiana, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 F.2d 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorentzen-v-brazil-oiticica-ca4-1944.