Lorenson v. J. H. Conrad & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Lorenson v. J. H. Conrad & Co.

1912 OK 47, 129 P. 732, 35 Okla. 406, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 593

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 9, 1912

Docket3071

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK 47 (Lorenson v. J. H. Conrad & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lorenson v. J. H. Conrad & Co., 1912 OK 47, 129 P. 732, 35 Okla. 406, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 593 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

KANE, J.

There is a motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled cause, upon the ground, among others, “that the case-made was not served upon the defendant in error or its counsel within three days after the motion for a new trial was overruled, as provided by law, and was not served upon the defendant in error or its counsel within the extension of time granted *407 by the trial court for the plaintiffs in error to prepare and serve the case-made.”

The record shows that the case-made was not served until three days after the expiration of the. time granted by the court to the plaintiffs in error to prepare and serve the case-made upon the defendant in error or its counsel. That is a sufficient ground for dismissal.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KANE, J.

There is a motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled cause, upon the ground, among others, “that the case-made was not served upon the defendant in error or its counsel within three days after the motion for a new trial was overruled, as provided by law, and was not served upon the defendant in error or its counsel within the extension of time granted *407 by the trial court for the plaintiffs in error to prepare and serve the case-made.”

The record shows that the case-made was not served until three days after the expiration of the. time granted by the court to the plaintiffs in error to prepare and serve the case-made upon the defendant in error or its counsel. That is a sufficient ground for dismissal.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 47, 129 P. 732, 35 Okla. 406, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenson-v-j-h-conrad-co-okla-1912.