Lorena Alfaro v. the State of Florida
This text of Lorena Alfaro v. the State of Florida (Lorena Alfaro v. the State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 19, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-16 Lower Tribunal No. F17-16513 ________________
Lorena Alfaro, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129, 1135 (Fla. 1986) (“Application of the [harmless error] test requires an examination of the entire
record by the appellate court including a close examination of the permissible
evidence on which the jury could have legitimately relied, and in addition an
even closer examination of the impermissible evidence which might have
possibly influenced the jury verdict.”); Potter v. State, 304 So. 3d 1270, 1277
n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“[A] reviewing court applying the harmless error test
can consider the overwhelming nature of the State’s evidence where a
defendant’s guilt is established by evidence unrelated to the claimed error.”);
Johnson v. State, No. 3D23-2183, 2025 WL 15398, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan.
2, 2025) (“Fundamental error is defined as the type of error which reaches
down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty
could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error. . .
. [It] should be applied only in the rare cases where a jurisdictional error
appears or where the interests of justice present a compelling demand for its
application.” (cleaned up) (first quoting Scott v. State, 218 So. 3d 476, 478
(Fla. 3d DCA 2017); then quoting Ray v. State, 403 So. 2d 956, 960 (Fla.
1981))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lorena Alfaro v. the State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorena-alfaro-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.