Loren Brewer v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation Schlumberger, N v. A/K/A Schlumberger Limited Rig Relocators, LLC Rig Relocators And Jose Salazar, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 7, 2016
Docket04-16-00519-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Loren Brewer v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation Schlumberger, N v. A/K/A Schlumberger Limited Rig Relocators, LLC Rig Relocators And Jose Salazar, Jr. (Loren Brewer v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation Schlumberger, N v. A/K/A Schlumberger Limited Rig Relocators, LLC Rig Relocators And Jose Salazar, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loren Brewer v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation Schlumberger, N v. A/K/A Schlumberger Limited Rig Relocators, LLC Rig Relocators And Jose Salazar, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 7, 2016

No. 04-16-00519-CV

Loren BREWER, Appellant

v.

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; Schlumberger, N.V. A/K/A Schlumberger Limited; Rig Relocators, LLC; Rig Relocators; and Jose Salazar, Jr., Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas Trial Court No. 14-09-53692-CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

ORDER The clerk’s record is due September 9, 2016. On September 2, 2016, the clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk’s record would not be filed on or before September 9, 2016, because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fee.

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court on or before September 19, 2016 that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the clerk have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to the clerk=s record without prepayment of the clerk’s fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1; id. R. 35.3(a). If appellant fails to file such proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Loren Brewer v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation Schlumberger, N v. A/K/A Schlumberger Limited Rig Relocators, LLC Rig Relocators And Jose Salazar, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loren-brewer-v-schlumberger-technology-corporation-schlumberger-n-v-texapp-2016.