Loreen Edwards v. Erin Schnitzer
This text of Loreen Edwards v. Erin Schnitzer (Loreen Edwards v. Erin Schnitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00012-CV
______________________________________________________________
LOREEN EDWARDS, Appellant,
ERIN SCHNITZER, Appellee.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-06-0091-E. The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that all matters at issue between the parties have been settled. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and the parties' agreed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). The parties' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 26th day of March, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Loreen Edwards v. Erin Schnitzer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loreen-edwards-v-erin-schnitzer-texapp-2009.