Loredo v. Csx Transportation, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Loredo v. Csx Transportation, Inc.

621 S.E.2d 626, 360 N.C. 65, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1014

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 6, 2005

DocketNo. 297A05.

StatusPublished

This text of 621 S.E.2d 626 (Loredo v. Csx Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loredo v. Csx Transportation, Inc., 621 S.E.2d 626, 360 N.C. 65, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1014 (N.C. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiffs on the 1st day of June 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Justice MARTIN recused.

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiffs' new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiffs on the 1st day of June 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Justice MARTIN recused.

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiffs' new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 S.E.2d 626, 360 N.C. 65, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loredo-v-csx-transportation-inc-nc-2005.