Lore v. U-Totem of Miami, Inc.
This text of 463 So. 2d 588 (Lore v. U-Totem of Miami, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Finding that the record reflects the absence of any genuine issue of material fact regarding the existence of a defective condition causing appellant Lore’s fall on the sidewalk of appellee U-Totem of Miami, Inc. [U-Totem], we affirm the summary final judgment in favor of U-Totem. Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982); Proprietors Insurance Company v. Siegel, 410 So.2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 So. 2d 588, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 465, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lore-v-u-totem-of-miami-inc-fladistctapp-1985.