Lore v. U-Totem of Miami, Inc.

463 So. 2d 588, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 465, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12482
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1794
StatusPublished

This text of 463 So. 2d 588 (Lore v. U-Totem of Miami, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lore v. U-Totem of Miami, Inc., 463 So. 2d 588, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 465, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12482 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the record reflects the absence of any genuine issue of material fact regarding the existence of a defective condition causing appellant Lore’s fall on the sidewalk of appellee U-Totem of Miami, Inc. [U-Totem], we affirm the summary final judgment in favor of U-Totem. Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982); Proprietors Insurance Company v. Siegel, 410 So.2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.
410 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Proprietors Ins. Co. v. Siegel
410 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 So. 2d 588, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 465, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lore-v-u-totem-of-miami-inc-fladistctapp-1985.