Lore v. U-Totem of Miami, Inc.
463 So. 2d 588, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 465, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12482
Opinion
Finding that the record reflects the absence of any genuine issue of material fact regarding the existence of a defective condition causing appellant Lore’s fall on the sidewalk of appellee U-Totem of Miami, Inc. [U-Totem], we affirm the summary final judgment in favor of U-Totem. Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982); Proprietors Insurance Company v. Siegel, 410 So.2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lore v. U-Totem of Miami, Inc., 463 So. 2d 588, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 465, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12482 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
463 So. 2d 588 (Lore v. U-Totem of Miami, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.
410 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Proprietors Ins. Co. v. Siegel
410 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)