LordMaster v. Augusta Correctional Center Personnel
Opinion
In these consolidated cases, Frankie Jae LordMaster seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints for failure to comply with the court’s orders and denying his motions for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. LordMaster v. Augusta Corr. Ctr. Personnel, Nos. 7:14-cv-00014-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00021-MFU-RSB (W.D.Va. filed Feb. 7, 2014 & entered Feb. 10, 2014; Apr. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
575 F. App'x 117 (LordMaster v. Augusta Correctional Center Personnel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.