Lordeus v. State
652 So. 2d 989, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3664, 1995 WL 170397
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1995·No. No. 94-2336·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for burglary and petit theft. We affirm the convictions. However, we remand the case to the trial court with directions to enter a corrected judgment of conviction for burglary of a structure, not burglary of an occupied dwelling. See Lopez v. State, 470 So.2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (trial court’s judgment must conform to jury’s verdict).
Affirmed in part; remanded for entry of corrected judgment of conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lordeus v. State, 652 So. 2d 989, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3664, 1995 WL 170397 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
652 So. 2d 989 (Lordeus v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A.R. v. State
661 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)